Showing posts with label dbs. Show all posts
Showing posts with label dbs. Show all posts

Thursday, March 29, 2012

Backup strategy

I've recently inherited a position where I am responsible for the well-being
of some DBs.
2 (much) more important than others.
The current recovery model, from what I can tell, is to do a full db/log
backup overnight.
This .bak file is then written to tape as well as saved on the disk for 2
days.

Both these dbs are used fairly extensively 8-5pm and losing data would not
be good.
The db sizes are approx 5gb and 3gb.
This doesn't seem like the ideal situation to me. Everything I read tells
me... full backup periodically, differential nightly and transaction hourly.
Agreed?
If so then I have 2 questions:
1. Is the best way to do this via a maintenance plan or by scripting and
scheduling?
2. What, if any, overhead can be expected with regular transaction backups
during work hours?

A bit of a pointer to #1 would be appreciated also.
Thanks.Both the databases are quite small, so using full, differential and log
backups may be overkill - you might find that a full backup once or
twice a day with log backups every hour (or whatever) is fine. On the
other hand, if the databases are growing fast, then you may want to
allow for that from the beginning.

In my opinion, maintenance plans are useful for quickly getting backups
running in a new environment, but their functionality and flexibility
can be limited. So I would probably use them as a starting point while
I worked out what the longer term backup plan should be. For example, I
don't believe that maintenance plans support differential backups, so
if you need them then you would have to create your own jobs anyway.
See "Reducing Recovery Time" in Books Online for details of using
different backup types together.

The overhead of a transaction log backup is likely to be minimal, but
as always, it's best to test it yourself in your own environment. It
would depend on the number of transactions, the disk layout and the
destination for the backups etc. But even if there is some slight
impact, it's probably a small price to pay for having the backups
available in the case of an outage.

Simon|||Jay,

The only thing I use the maintenance jobs for are two (2) tasks.
1. checking the consistency of the database (usually at 11pm on Sat)
2. doing the reindex of the database (usally at 1 am on Fri)

The rest of the backups I script manually. I create a backup device for
each database.
Job #1 - Full Backup of the database (usually at 6pm each night)
Job #2 - Transaction log backup every hour from 7am to 5pm.
Job #3 - Full backup of the database to a separate device at 12 noon (not
all databases)

Oscar...

"Jay" <jazemail@.gmail.com> wrote in message
news:Hqepe.5753$U4.811596@.news.xtra.co.nz...
> I've recently inherited a position where I am responsible for the
well-being
> of some DBs.
> 2 (much) more important than others.
> The current recovery model, from what I can tell, is to do a full db/log
> backup overnight.
> This .bak file is then written to tape as well as saved on the disk for 2
> days.
> Both these dbs are used fairly extensively 8-5pm and losing data would not
> be good.
> The db sizes are approx 5gb and 3gb.
> This doesn't seem like the ideal situation to me. Everything I read tells
> me... full backup periodically, differential nightly and transaction
hourly.
> Agreed?
> If so then I have 2 questions:
> 1. Is the best way to do this via a maintenance plan or by scripting and
> scheduling?
> 2. What, if any, overhead can be expected with regular transaction backups
> during work hours?
> A bit of a pointer to #1 would be appreciated also.
> Thanks.|||"Oscar Santiesteban Jr." <oscarsantiesteban@.worldnet.att.net> wrote in
message news:Qgtpe.912601$w62.11314@.bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> Jay,
> The only thing I use the maintenance jobs for are two (2) tasks.
> 1. checking the consistency of the database (usually at 11pm on Sat)
> 2. doing the reindex of the database (usally at 1 am on Fri)

Forgive me if I don't follow your practise. Those hours are the only hours
I'm *not* thinking about DBs :)
I've learned that the transaction log is written to 2 HDD (raid) so it isn't
as bad as I thought.
As a precaution I now back up the transaction log to a USB drive each
lunchtime.

Cheers
Jay

> The rest of the backups I script manually. I create a backup device for
> each database.
> Job #1 - Full Backup of the database (usually at 6pm each night)
> Job #2 - Transaction log backup every hour from 7am to 5pm.
> Job #3 - Full backup of the database to a separate device at 12 noon (not
> all databases)
> Oscar...
> "Jay" <jazemail@.gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:Hqepe.5753$U4.811596@.news.xtra.co.nz...
>> I've recently inherited a position where I am responsible for the
> well-being
>> of some DBs.
>> 2 (much) more important than others.
>> The current recovery model, from what I can tell, is to do a full db/log
>> backup overnight.
>> This .bak file is then written to tape as well as saved on the disk for 2
>> days.
>>
>> Both these dbs are used fairly extensively 8-5pm and losing data would
>> not
>> be good.
>> The db sizes are approx 5gb and 3gb.
>> This doesn't seem like the ideal situation to me. Everything I read tells
>> me... full backup periodically, differential nightly and transaction
> hourly.
>> Agreed?
>> If so then I have 2 questions:
>> 1. Is the best way to do this via a maintenance plan or by scripting and
>> scheduling?
>> 2. What, if any, overhead can be expected with regular transaction
>> backups
>> during work hours?
>>
>> A bit of a pointer to #1 would be appreciated also.
>> Thanks.
>>
>>|||"Jay" <jazemail@.gmail.com> wrote in message
news:Hqepe.5753$U4.811596@.news.xtra.co.nz...
> I've recently inherited a position where I am responsible for the
well-being
> of some DBs.
> 2 (much) more important than others.
> The current recovery model, from what I can tell, is to do a full db/log
> backup overnight.
> This .bak file is then written to tape as well as saved on the disk for 2
> days.
> Both these dbs are used fairly extensively 8-5pm and losing data would not
> be good.
> The db sizes are approx 5gb and 3gb.
> This doesn't seem like the ideal situation to me. Everything I read tells
> me... full backup periodically, differential nightly and transaction
hourly.
> Agreed?
> If so then I have 2 questions:
> 1. Is the best way to do this via a maintenance plan or by scripting and
> scheduling?

For this I'd use a simple maintenance plan to back up your logs every X
minutes.

> 2. What, if any, overhead can be expected with regular transaction backups
> during work hours?

VERY little.

We run our transaction log backups every 20 minutes and notice no impact.

(in fact, ironically in some cases, running them MORE often can be better
since they'll be smaller when you do run them.)

> A bit of a pointer to #1 would be appreciated also.
> Thanks.

Sunday, March 25, 2012

backup speed SQL 2000

I'm running a manually written nightly backup script on all dbs on a
server. it's a dev server FYI.
the script does the following for all databases:
dbcc checkdb
dbcc dbreindex (on all relevant tables) -- this is done once a week
only
backup transaction with no_log
backup database
now... the duration for this is around 2 hours, given the number &
size of the databases. however, on the night I do the dbcc dbreindex,
the duration drops to 5 minutes. i've added the dbcc dbreindex to run
on other nights, and yes it drops down to 5 minutes each time. next
time it runs without, back up to 2 hours.....
why?
if any other info is required, i will supply.
Specify an output file and check for error messages.
Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP
http://www.karaszi.com/sqlserver/default.asp
http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi
<bmwbase-newsgroup@.yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1179959856.718711.314480@.x35g2000prf.googlegr oups.com...
> I'm running a manually written nightly backup script on all dbs on a
> server. it's a dev server FYI.
> the script does the following for all databases:
> dbcc checkdb
> dbcc dbreindex (on all relevant tables) -- this is done once a week
> only
> backup transaction with no_log
> backup database
> now... the duration for this is around 2 hours, given the number &
> size of the databases. however, on the night I do the dbcc dbreindex,
> the duration drops to 5 minutes. i've added the dbcc dbreindex to run
> on other nights, and yes it drops down to 5 minutes each time. next
> time it runs without, back up to 2 hours.....
> why?
> if any other info is required, i will supply.
>

backup speed SQL 2000

I'm running a manually written nightly backup script on all dbs on a
server. it's a dev server FYI.
the script does the following for all databases:
dbcc checkdb
dbcc dbreindex (on all relevant tables) -- this is done once a week
only
backup transaction with no_log
backup database
now... the duration for this is around 2 hours, given the number &
size of the databases. however, on the night I do the dbcc dbreindex,
the duration drops to 5 minutes. i've added the dbcc dbreindex to run
on other nights, and yes it drops down to 5 minutes each time. next
time it runs without, back up to 2 hours.....
why?
if any other info is required, i will supply.Specify an output file and check for error messages.
--
Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP
http://www.karaszi.com/sqlserver/default.asp
http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi
<bmwbase-newsgroup@.yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1179959856.718711.314480@.x35g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> I'm running a manually written nightly backup script on all dbs on a
> server. it's a dev server FYI.
> the script does the following for all databases:
> dbcc checkdb
> dbcc dbreindex (on all relevant tables) -- this is done once a week
> only
> backup transaction with no_log
> backup database
> now... the duration for this is around 2 hours, given the number &
> size of the databases. however, on the night I do the dbcc dbreindex,
> the duration drops to 5 minutes. i've added the dbcc dbreindex to run
> on other nights, and yes it drops down to 5 minutes each time. next
> time it runs without, back up to 2 hours.....
> why?
> if any other info is required, i will supply.
>sql

backup speed SQL 2000

I'm running a manually written nightly backup script on all dbs on a
server. it's a dev server FYI.
the script does the following for all databases:
dbcc checkdb
dbcc dbreindex (on all relevant tables) -- this is done once a week
only
backup transaction with no_log
backup database
now... the duration for this is around 2 hours, given the number &
size of the databases. however, on the night I do the dbcc dbreindex,
the duration drops to 5 minutes. i've added the dbcc dbreindex to run
on other nights, and yes it drops down to 5 minutes each time. next
time it runs without, back up to 2 hours.....
why?
if any other info is required, i will supply.Specify an output file and check for error messages.
Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP
http://www.karaszi.com/sqlserver/default.asp
http://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi
<bmwbase-newsgroup@.yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1179959856.718711.314480@.x35g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> I'm running a manually written nightly backup script on all dbs on a
> server. it's a dev server FYI.
> the script does the following for all databases:
> dbcc checkdb
> dbcc dbreindex (on all relevant tables) -- this is done once a week
> only
> backup transaction with no_log
> backup database
> now... the duration for this is around 2 hours, given the number &
> size of the databases. however, on the night I do the dbcc dbreindex,
> the duration drops to 5 minutes. i've added the dbcc dbreindex to run
> on other nights, and yes it drops down to 5 minutes each time. next
> time it runs without, back up to 2 hours.....
> why?
> if any other info is required, i will supply.
>

Thursday, March 8, 2012

Backup over network

Hi ,
From last year I have created a backups over network
but form few days for two dbs which are more than 3gb
the backup is failing .
its showing operating system error 64 & 87
any idea
Regards
ajaySystem error 64 says: "The specified network name is no longer available."
Check if the network share is still available. Maybe somebodey renamed
computer?
--
Dejan Sarka, SQL Server MVP
Please reply only to the newsgroups.
"R. Ajay" <ajudba@.yahoo.co.in> wrote in message
news:#tWkBdzrDHA.1996@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> Hi ,
> From last year I have created a backups over network
> but form few days for two dbs which are more than 3gb
> the backup is failing .
> its showing operating system error 64 & 87
> any idea
> Regards
> ajay
>
>|||Hi
Thanks for reply
right now more than 100 dbs are getting backed up on the same server all are
getting success but except two which are of 3 gb size .
Regards
Ajay
"Dejan Sarka" <dejan_please_reply_to_newsgroups.sarka@.avtenta.si> wrote in
message news:#4yqZe0rDHA.2148@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> System error 64 says: "The specified network name is no longer available."
> Check if the network share is still available. Maybe somebodey renamed
> computer?
> --
> Dejan Sarka, SQL Server MVP
> Please reply only to the newsgroups.
> "R. Ajay" <ajudba@.yahoo.co.in> wrote in message
> news:#tWkBdzrDHA.1996@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> > Hi ,
> > From last year I have created a backups over network
> > but form few days for two dbs which are more than 3gb
> > the backup is failing .
> > its showing operating system error 64 & 87
> > any idea
> >
> > Regards
> > ajay
> >
> >
> >
> >
>|||We see those problems all the times posted here. Seems like SQL Server isn't that happy with writing
over the network for larger databases. I guess you could open a case with MS Support, don't know how
much that would help, though. One option can be to backup locally and then copy the file (possibly
packing it first).
--
Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP
Archive at: http://groups.google.com/groups?oi=djq&as_ugroup=microsoft.public.sqlserver
"R. Ajay" <ajudba@.yahoo.co.in> wrote in message news:%238QOeG1rDHA.2248@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> Hi
> Thanks for reply
> right now more than 100 dbs are getting backed up on the same server all are
> getting success but except two which are of 3 gb size .
> Regards
> Ajay
> "Dejan Sarka" <dejan_please_reply_to_newsgroups.sarka@.avtenta.si> wrote in
> message news:#4yqZe0rDHA.2148@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> > System error 64 says: "The specified network name is no longer available."
> > Check if the network share is still available. Maybe somebodey renamed
> > computer?
> >
> > --
> > Dejan Sarka, SQL Server MVP
> > Please reply only to the newsgroups.
> >
> > "R. Ajay" <ajudba@.yahoo.co.in> wrote in message
> > news:#tWkBdzrDHA.1996@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> > > Hi ,
> > > From last year I have created a backups over network
> > > but form few days for two dbs which are more than 3gb
> > > the backup is failing .
> > > its showing operating system error 64 & 87
> > > any idea
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > ajay
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>|||Hi Tibor,
Every day I am doing backup over network for the database which has a size
of 56 GB. No issues so far.
I feel Ajay's issue was due to some network problems.
Ajay ,
What you can do is from command prompt put a "Ping" to the network server
and see to that always you are getting reply.
Thanks
Hari
MCDBA
"Tibor Karaszi" <tibor.please_reply_to_public_forum.karaszi@.cornerstone.se>
wrote in message news:uL9$tU1rDHA.1784@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> We see those problems all the times posted here. Seems like SQL Server
isn't that happy with writing
> over the network for larger databases. I guess you could open a case with
MS Support, don't know how
> much that would help, though. One option can be to backup locally and then
copy the file (possibly
> packing it first).
> --
> Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP
> Archive at:
http://groups.google.com/groups?oi=djq&as_ugroup=microsoft.public.sqlserver
>
> "R. Ajay" <ajudba@.yahoo.co.in> wrote in message
news:%238QOeG1rDHA.2248@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> > Hi
> > Thanks for reply
> > right now more than 100 dbs are getting backed up on the same server all
are
> > getting success but except two which are of 3 gb size .
> >
> > Regards
> > Ajay
> > "Dejan Sarka" <dejan_please_reply_to_newsgroups.sarka@.avtenta.si> wrote
in
> > message news:#4yqZe0rDHA.2148@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> > > System error 64 says: "The specified network name is no longer
available."
> > > Check if the network share is still available. Maybe somebodey renamed
> > > computer?
> > >
> > > --
> > > Dejan Sarka, SQL Server MVP
> > > Please reply only to the newsgroups.
> > >
> > > "R. Ajay" <ajudba@.yahoo.co.in> wrote in message
> > > news:#tWkBdzrDHA.1996@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> > > > Hi ,
> > > > From last year I have created a backups over network
> > > > but form few days for two dbs which are more than 3gb
> > > > the backup is failing .
> > > > its showing operating system error 64 & 87
> > > > any idea
> > > >
> > > > Regards
> > > > ajay
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>|||I now that it work in some installations, but if you check the newsgroup archive, you will see that
this is a frequent post, and frequently smaller databases are OK - which rules out permissions,
share mappings UNC naming etc.
--
Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP
Archive at: http://groups.google.com/groups?oi=djq&as_ugroup=microsoft.public.sqlserver
"Hari" <hari_prasad_k@.hotmail.com> wrote in message news:%236Dz$W2rDHA.3436@.tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> Hi Tibor,
> Every day I am doing backup over network for the database which has a size
> of 56 GB. No issues so far.
> I feel Ajay's issue was due to some network problems.
> Ajay ,
> What you can do is from command prompt put a "Ping" to the network server
> and see to that always you are getting reply.
>
> Thanks
> Hari
> MCDBA
>
> "Tibor Karaszi" <tibor.please_reply_to_public_forum.karaszi@.cornerstone.se>
> wrote in message news:uL9$tU1rDHA.1784@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> > We see those problems all the times posted here. Seems like SQL Server
> isn't that happy with writing
> > over the network for larger databases. I guess you could open a case with
> MS Support, don't know how
> > much that would help, though. One option can be to backup locally and then
> copy the file (possibly
> > packing it first).
> >
> > --
> > Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP
> > Archive at:
> http://groups.google.com/groups?oi=djq&as_ugroup=microsoft.public.sqlserver
> >
> >
> > "R. Ajay" <ajudba@.yahoo.co.in> wrote in message
> news:%238QOeG1rDHA.2248@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> > > Hi
> > > Thanks for reply
> > > right now more than 100 dbs are getting backed up on the same server all
> are
> > > getting success but except two which are of 3 gb size .
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > Ajay
> > > "Dejan Sarka" <dejan_please_reply_to_newsgroups.sarka@.avtenta.si> wrote
> in
> > > message news:#4yqZe0rDHA.2148@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> > > > System error 64 says: "The specified network name is no longer
> available."
> > > > Check if the network share is still available. Maybe somebodey renamed
> > > > computer?
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Dejan Sarka, SQL Server MVP
> > > > Please reply only to the newsgroups.
> > > >
> > > > "R. Ajay" <ajudba@.yahoo.co.in> wrote in message
> > > > news:#tWkBdzrDHA.1996@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> > > > > Hi ,
> > > > > From last year I have created a backups over network
> > > > > but form few days for two dbs which are more than 3gb
> > > > > the backup is failing .
> > > > > its showing operating system error 64 & 87
> > > > > any idea
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards
> > > > > ajay
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>

Thursday, February 16, 2012

backup jobs not runing on mssql7

Hi there,
I have a mssql-7 and 2/5 dbs get backed up nightly through
the scheduled backup jobs. 3 dbs keep failing at nights
and if I run the job manually. I can manually backup the
DBs through ALL TASKS..BACKUP DATABASE.
I've Checked:
SP-4
service running
sql agent running as admin
Job enabled
MDAC (latest)
jobs are 15mins apart
Any suggestions are appriciated.
ThanXHave you checked the logs and Agent history? What is the error that gets
produced?
Andrew J. Kelly SQL MVP
"Emil" <anonymous@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:ed5901c43d33$cbb41660$a101280a@.phx.gbl...
> Hi there,
> I have a mssql-7 and 2/5 dbs get backed up nightly through
> the scheduled backup jobs. 3 dbs keep failing at nights
> and if I run the job manually. I can manually backup the
> DBs through ALL TASKS..BACKUP DATABASE.
> I've Checked:
> SP-4
> service running
> sql agent running as admin
> Job enabled
> MDAC (latest)
> jobs are 15mins apart
> Any suggestions are appriciated.
> ThanX
>|||Andrew,
I have cheched the agent log and its clean! and the server
log doesn't mention anything regarding the job failure.
ThanX
>--Original Message--
>Have you checked the logs and Agent history? What is the
error that gets
>produced?
>--
>Andrew J. Kelly SQL MVP
>
>"Emil" <anonymous@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in
message
>news:ed5901c43d33$cbb41660$a101280a@.phx.gbl...
through[vbcol=seagreen]
>
>.
>|||What about the Job History? Right click on thjob in EM and choose Show
History. Then check the checkbox labeled Show Details and see what that
says.
Andrew J. Kelly SQL MVP
"Emil" <anonymous@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:f29b01c43dad$56d3bc90$a601280a@.phx.gbl...[vbcol=seagreen]
> Andrew,
> I have cheched the agent log and its clean! and the server
> log doesn't mention anything regarding the job failure.
> ThanX
> error that gets
> message
> through

Monday, February 13, 2012

backup jobs not runing on mssql7

Hi there,
I have a mssql-7 and 2/5 dbs get backed up nightly through
the scheduled backup jobs. 3 dbs keep failing at nights
and if I run the job manually. I can manually backup the
DBs through ALL TASKS..BACKUP DATABASE.
I've Checked:
SP-4
service running
sql agent running as admin
Job enabled
MDAC (latest)
jobs are 15mins apart
Any suggestions are appriciated.
ThanX
Have you checked the logs and Agent history? What is the error that gets
produced?
Andrew J. Kelly SQL MVP
"Emil" <anonymous@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:ed5901c43d33$cbb41660$a101280a@.phx.gbl...
> Hi there,
> I have a mssql-7 and 2/5 dbs get backed up nightly through
> the scheduled backup jobs. 3 dbs keep failing at nights
> and if I run the job manually. I can manually backup the
> DBs through ALL TASKS..BACKUP DATABASE.
> I've Checked:
> SP-4
> service running
> sql agent running as admin
> Job enabled
> MDAC (latest)
> jobs are 15mins apart
> Any suggestions are appriciated.
> ThanX
>
|||Andrew,
I have cheched the agent log and its clean! and the server
log doesn't mention anything regarding the job failure.
ThanX
>--Original Message--
>Have you checked the logs and Agent history? What is the
error that gets
>produced?
>--
>Andrew J. Kelly SQL MVP
>
>"Emil" <anonymous@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in
message[vbcol=seagreen]
>news:ed5901c43d33$cbb41660$a101280a@.phx.gbl...
through
>
>.
>
|||What about the Job History? Right click on thjob in EM and choose Show
History. Then check the checkbox labeled Show Details and see what that
says.
Andrew J. Kelly SQL MVP
"Emil" <anonymous@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:f29b01c43dad$56d3bc90$a601280a@.phx.gbl...[vbcol=seagreen]
> Andrew,
> I have cheched the agent log and its clean! and the server
> log doesn't mention anything regarding the job failure.
> ThanX
> error that gets
> message
> through

backup jobs not runing on mssql7

Hi there,
I have a mssql-7 and 2/5 dbs get backed up nightly through
the scheduled backup jobs. 3 dbs keep failing at nights
and if I run the job manually. I can manually backup the
DBs through ALL TASKS..BACKUP DATABASE.
I've Checked:
SP-4
service running
sql agent running as admin
Job enabled
MDAC (latest)
jobs are 15mins apart
Any suggestions are appriciated.
ThanXHave you checked the logs and Agent history? What is the error that gets
produced?
--
Andrew J. Kelly SQL MVP
"Emil" <anonymous@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:ed5901c43d33$cbb41660$a101280a@.phx.gbl...
> Hi there,
> I have a mssql-7 and 2/5 dbs get backed up nightly through
> the scheduled backup jobs. 3 dbs keep failing at nights
> and if I run the job manually. I can manually backup the
> DBs through ALL TASKS..BACKUP DATABASE.
> I've Checked:
> SP-4
> service running
> sql agent running as admin
> Job enabled
> MDAC (latest)
> jobs are 15mins apart
> Any suggestions are appriciated.
> ThanX
>|||Andrew,
I have cheched the agent log and its clean! and the server
log doesn't mention anything regarding the job failure.
ThanX
>--Original Message--
>Have you checked the logs and Agent history? What is the
error that gets
>produced?
>--
>Andrew J. Kelly SQL MVP
>
>"Emil" <anonymous@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in
message
>news:ed5901c43d33$cbb41660$a101280a@.phx.gbl...
>> Hi there,
>> I have a mssql-7 and 2/5 dbs get backed up nightly
through
>> the scheduled backup jobs. 3 dbs keep failing at nights
>> and if I run the job manually. I can manually backup the
>> DBs through ALL TASKS..BACKUP DATABASE.
>> I've Checked:
>> SP-4
>> service running
>> sql agent running as admin
>> Job enabled
>> MDAC (latest)
>> jobs are 15mins apart
>> Any suggestions are appriciated.
>> ThanX
>>
>
>.
>|||What about the Job History? Right click on thjob in EM and choose Show
History. Then check the checkbox labeled Show Details and see what that
says.
--
Andrew J. Kelly SQL MVP
"Emil" <anonymous@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:f29b01c43dad$56d3bc90$a601280a@.phx.gbl...
> Andrew,
> I have cheched the agent log and its clean! and the server
> log doesn't mention anything regarding the job failure.
> ThanX
> >--Original Message--
> >Have you checked the logs and Agent history? What is the
> error that gets
> >produced?
> >
> >--
> >Andrew J. Kelly SQL MVP
> >
> >
> >"Emil" <anonymous@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in
> message
> >news:ed5901c43d33$cbb41660$a101280a@.phx.gbl...
> >> Hi there,
> >> I have a mssql-7 and 2/5 dbs get backed up nightly
> through
> >> the scheduled backup jobs. 3 dbs keep failing at nights
> >> and if I run the job manually. I can manually backup the
> >> DBs through ALL TASKS..BACKUP DATABASE.
> >>
> >> I've Checked:
> >> SP-4
> >> service running
> >> sql agent running as admin
> >> Job enabled
> >> MDAC (latest)
> >> jobs are 15mins apart
> >>
> >> Any suggestions are appriciated.
> >> ThanX
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >.
> >